Also, his FNaF2 theory was completely right about everything except Purple Guy being Phone Guy according to Scott. His 3 theory was mostly right too, but we don't know which parts were wrong and right. After 4 is where you should more wary about what he says, before that he's pretty much on the money with most things (besides his first FNaF a. ** (1)** obsolete : UPROOT. (2): to eradicate and supply a substitute forefforts to supplant the vernacular. b: to take the place of and serve as a substitute for especially by reason of superior excellence or power. Special thanks to Honey for sponsoring this episode!Join Honey for FREE! New Theory! I think I’ve figured out a few more details about the ‘missing children’s incident’ (MCI) in FNAF. Firstly, we know that five children we’re killed (three boys and two girls). Secondly even though the games and the books take place on different timelines, certain things like the MCI are somewhat the same in both timelines. FNAF Theories ruined Game Theory for me. Discussion. So I first stumbled upon Game Theory in 2014, and since then have been an avid fan of MatPat's channels, with Food Theory being my current favorite of them all. However, I honestly don't enjoy Game Theory anymore, and I feel like it's mostly because of the channel's obsession with FNAF theories. A commonly accepted theory is that, after the events of the fourth Follow Me minigame in FNaF 3, the dismantled endoskeletons of the Classic animatronics were taken by the Purple Guy and melted down into haunted metal to breathe life into the Funtime animatronics, who later end up as Molten Freddy, meaning the Children remain central to the CQH1. Yeaaah. I remember when Game Theory just started ages ago, and I pop in to watch a video if it's in a relevant game series I liked or if it was funny enough. I got into FNAF lore because of the theory videos. I stayed for over a decade because od his personality, and I don't even know who the new people are. In FNAF 1 Phone Guy hints that many guards died in that office. They probably died in 1993. There is no reason for an MCI in 1985. The MCI occurred shortly after the springlocks incident. The springlocks incident happens in 1983 (Fredbear's still existed). Also, 1985 is a date that never appears in games. Back in FNAF 2, The OG Animatronics were withered, Micheal in FNAF 2 could be dealing with the animatronics after William disassembled them, just lazily put back together and stored in the parts and service room. Then in by the time Michael takes a job in FNAF 1, they were put back together properly. They had spare endo skeletons anyway so He is trying his best as a fan, a theorist and with the info he has. We can all disagree or agree on theories, but being hurtful isn't warranted. Let's remember that the word Theory in "Game Theory" implies exploring ideas to explain facts, not imposing absolute truths without being open to more possibilities. fnaf ruin tally marks in 5 by 5 grid. FNaF. has any one tried to add the coloumn of the tally marks in the baby plushie room when they are in a 5 by 5 grid and then putting the resolts in a base 20 decode because 20 can be divided by 4,5,2 which are the only amount that tally marks was. 1. New Theory! I think I’ve figured out a few more details about the ‘missing children’s incident’ (MCI) in FNAF. Firstly, we know that five children we’re killed (three boys and two girls). Secondly even though the games and the books take place on different timelines, certain things like the MCI are somewhat the same in both timelines.

fnaf in order game theory